Breaking News English

A scientist said robots will be more Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview than humans by 2029. The scientist's name is Ray Kurzweil. He works for Google as Director of Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview. He is one of the world's Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview experts on artificial intelligence (A.I.). Mr Kurzweil believes computers will be able to learn from Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview, just like humans. He also thinks they will be able to tell Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview and stories, and even flirt. Kurzweil's 2029 Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview is a lot sooner than many people thought. The scientist said that in 1999, many A.I. Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview said it would be hundreds of years before a computer was more intelligent than a Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview. He said that it would not be Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview before computer intelligence is one billion times more powerful than the human Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview.

Mr Kurzweil joked that many years Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview, people thought he was a little Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview for predicting computers would be as intelligent as humans. His thinking has stayed the same but Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview else has changed the way they think. He said: "My views are not Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview any more. I've actually stayed consistent. It's the Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview of the world that's changing its Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview." He highlighted examples of high-tech Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview we use, see or read about every day. These things make us believe that computers have intelligence. He said people think differently Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview: "Because the public has seen things like Siri [the iPhone's voice-recognition Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview] where you talk to a computer; they've seen the Google self-driving Engineeringagobraincarscrazyeveryoneexperiencesexpertshumanintelligentjokesleadinglongnowpredictionradicalresttechnologythingsview."