There is a phrase at by for in of on throughout to English when someone gets a big salary that they earn "telephone numbers". A man at by for in of on throughout to New York is suing the city (and others) for so much that it is almost impossible to think at by for in of on throughout to a comparison. Anton Purisima, 62, is suing at by for in of on throughout to two undecillion. Over 99.99 per cent at by for in of on throughout to English speakers would not know or have heard at by for in of on throughout to the word at by for in of on throughout to this amount. That astronomical figure is two undecillion dollars – a two followed at by for in of on throughout to 36 zeros. The only people who are likely to need this word are probably astrophysicists and astronomers. Two undecillion dollars is, at by for in of on throughout to fact, more than all the money at by for in of on throughout to the whole world. Even more than all the wealth created at by for in of on throughout to humankind's entire history. So what did New York City do so wrong to be sued at by for in of on throughout to such a mind-bogglingly gargantuan sum? Quite a lot, it seems. The New York Post reports that Mr Purisima is suing the city (as well as two local hospitals, LaGuardia Airport, the transportation system, a bakery and even a dog owner) at by for in of on throughout to "civil-rights violations, personal injury, discrimination at by for in of on throughout to national origin, retaliation, harassment, fraud, attempted murder, intentional infliction at by for in of on throughout to emotional distress, and conspiracy to defraud". Why? Well, it's because last month a "rabies-infected" dog bit his finger at by for in of on throughout to a city bus; then, a "Chinese couple" took photos at by for in of on throughout to him without asking; and to add insult at by for in of on throughout to injury, he is routinely overcharged at by for in of on throughout to coffee at by for in of on throughout to LaGuardia Airport.