Breaking News English

A new study says beef production is very amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater to the environment. It damages the environment around ten amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater more than the production of pork, lamb, chicken or other farm amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater. Scientists said cows need 28 times more land and 11 times more amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater than pigs, sheep or chickens. They also produce a lot of amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater gas after they eat. Compared to food like amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater, wheat, and rice, beef production needs 160 times more land and produces 11 times more greenhouse amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater. The scientists said farming (of amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater and crops) is a major amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater of global warming. It causes 15 per cent of all greenhouse gases. About amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater of this is from livestock.

One scientist said we could all reduce our amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater footprint by eating less beef. Professor Mark Sutton from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in the UK said cutting down on the amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater of beef we eat is amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater for the amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater than using the car less. He also said that if we ate amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater beef, we could use the wheat that amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater give to cows to feed amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater people. He said this sounds simple, but many governments would not try to do it. Professor Sutton said: "Governments should consider these amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater carefully if they want to improve amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater production." He added: "The message for the consumer is even stronger. Avoiding excessive meat consumption, amountanimalsbettercarboncausedamagingenvironmentespeciallyfarmersgasesgreenhousehalflesslivestockmessagesoverallpotatoesstarvingtimeswater beef, is good for the environment."