Women have to pay a lot more about at by for in into of on to up stores than men about at by for in into of on to up almost the same things. A new study about at by for in into of on to up The Times newspaper about at by for in into of on to up Britain found that many products about at by for in into of on to up women cost about at by for in into of on to up to twice as much as similar products about at by for in into of on to up men. Researchers looked about at by for in into of on to up hundreds of goods in the UK's biggest shops. They found that women's clothes and beauty products and girls' toys were about at by for in into of on to up average 36 per cent more expensive than products for men and boys. One store charged over $7 more about at by for in into of on to up a pink scooter aimed about at by for in into of on to up girls than a black one. Another store charged double the price about at by for in into of on to up ten razors simply because they were pink. Researchers said Levi's 501 jeans for women are about at by for in into of on to up average 46 per cent more expensive than those for men. The Times called this "sexist" pricing. Other people have called it a "gender tax". Maria Miller, the chairwoman about at by for in into of on to up the British government's women and equalities committee, called it a "rip-off". She said she would ask Britain's government to look about at by for in into of on to up this to see if there was price discrimination. Britain's Financial Times (FT) newspaper said: "Perhaps women tend to be busier and have less time to shop around. Or perhaps they care more about at by for in into of on to up quality when it comes about at by for in into of on to up deodorant or shampoo, whereas men just want something cheap." However, the FT said men paid more about at by for in into of on to up some things and questioned why the journalists did not look about at by for in into of on to up the price differences about at by for in into of on to up things that appeal more to men.