Breaking News English

An againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong who works for British Airways (BA) has told againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong about the company creating more CO2. The unnamed person is a againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong - someone who tells the truth about company againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong. The whistleblower said BA and many other airlines use "fuel-tankering" to save againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong. However, fuel-tankering is very bad for the againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong. Scientists say it adds to global warming. Fuel-tankering is when airplanes store extra againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong to get to their destination and back. This means the againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong saves money by paying for all the fuel in its againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong country instead of buying more expensive fuel at its destination. Scientists say fuel-tankering puts as much CO2 in the air each year as a large againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong.

A againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong about British Airways and fuel-tankering was shown on the BBC this againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong. In the documentary, the CEO of BA promised to look againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong at how it carries fuel. He said the airline uses the fuel-tankering method and said it was "maybe the againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong thing to do". The money saved by fuel-tankering for againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong flight is very small, but there is a big againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong to the environment. A againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong flight from London to Italy had three tons of againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong fuel. The airline saved just $50 on the flight but an extra 600kg of CO2 was put into the againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong. Greenpeace said this was a "classic example of a company putting profit before planet". It said: "They'll happily pour extra fuel on the fire for a small boost to their againairlineatmospherecostdocumentaryeachemployeeenvironmentextrafuelhomemoneynewspapersprofitrecentsecretstownweekwhistleblowerwrong margin."